The Toxic Fumes On Planes Are Knocking Out Pilots And Making

When passengers board the plane, they expect that everything will be alright with the aircraft. Decades of security innovations and regulations have made flying the safest form of flight. But as revealed in an explosive report by the Los Angeles Times that the planes are filled with toxic smoke, injuring the crew and passengers, while the Federal Aviation Administration and airline industry do nothing.

In July 2015, Spirit Airlines flight 708 landed in Boston and stood at its designated gate. However, there was a problem: the captain and co-pilot had no memory of landing or taxiing the Airbus A319. From the Los Angeles Times report:

The aircraft started landing in Boston. Inside the cockpit, the captain was slumped over his seat. Seated near him, Kokilcott was starting to walk out to Eric Tellman. The tailman managed to strip over his oxygen mask, then grabbed the captain’s arm and forced him to follow suit. Slowly reviving, the captain saw Telkam through his mask, and his eyes widened with fear. The strange smell allowed the aircraft that day. Passengers and flight attendants were tearfully tearing eyes. The pilots briefly lifted their masks and could still smell the odor as the odor could be seen as they came closer to the runway.

The gateman and captain parked the Airbus A319 at the gate. But he had no recollection of Spirit Airlines flight 708 landing or taxiing. Tellman went to the hospital for treatment and spent the next week at home in bed, vomiting and tremors and felt “as if a freight train had run over us,” he said in a letter to his union about the July 2015 incident.

The air you breathe on a commercial jet airliner is known as bleed air. Bleed air comes from the engine and provides pressure for the cabin and air for the environmental control system. When it is working by design, it is harmless. However, when problems such as poor sealing, hot engine oil and hydraulic fluid can leak into the air system, it can possibly release toxic fumes in the cabin.

When this happens, it is called a fumigation event. While airlines and safety regulators have known about them for decades, they do not keep these incidents normal, and the level of chemicals is not high enough to prevent serious medical risks.

However, the Times investigation has revealed some frightening figures, suggesting that fume occurrence is far more common than in airlines:

But a Times investigation found that vapors from oil and other liquids leak into planes with alarming frequency in all airlines, sometimes causing chaos and confusion: flight attendants vomit and pass out. Passengers struggle to breathe. Children ran towards hospitals. Pilots approach the open cockpit windows with oxygen masks or gasps for air.

Such events are documented in airport paramedic records reviewed by The Times, NASA’s safety report, federal aviation records, and other filings.

The tailman, Spirit Airlines pilot, was one of hundreds of airline crew members and passengers who reported being ill or impaired flights in recent years. A Times analysis of the NASA safety report from January 2018 to December 2019 identified 362 fume incidents that airline crew members reported to the agency, with approximately 400 pilots, flight attendants and passengers receiving medical attention. During at least 73 of those flights, the pilots used emergency oxygen. Four dozen pilots were described as being at the point of being unable to perform their duties.

Because they are done voluntarily, NASA’s safety reports are “the tip of the iceberg”, according to a recent study by a researcher at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Holiday travelers continue to receive warnings, while airlines have deferred the HEPA filter in the aircraft. However, these filters, N95 masks and surgical masks do not protect passengers from toxic fumes. Prior to the epidemic, the U.S. About five flights a day experienced a foggy incident, according to the Times.

So how did we get here? With weak rules that definitely favor private companies over people’s lives. From the Times again:

Airlines have been asking Boeing to install air sensors for years. But the company decided against developing the technology. Senior Boeing engineers worried that the censored data would prove damaging in lawsuits by sick passengers and crew members, according to sworn statements received by internal passengers and The Times.

According to a statement from a Boeing executive, an internal Boeing memo described it as a “risk” to deliver the air sensor to an airline.

The 2015 memo stated, “Flight attendants, pilot unions, and congressional supporters can use the effort to censor evidence and require air sensors to be placed on all aircraft when the sensor is needed.” Litigation.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *